Zapier's Agents以 7,000+ 个连接应用为依据的 AI 自动化代理

5.0 (6)

审阅者 Daniel Nikulshyn·更新 2026年7月

AI Agents No-Code Workflow Automation Integrations Productivity Business Automation

1 / 2

概览

Zapier's Agents 将自主人工智能带入 Zapier 自动化生态系统，允许用户构建能够推理、采取行动并在数千个集成应用中协调任务的代理。代理可以解释上下文、做出决策并按需执行多步骤工作流，而不仅仅依赖于僵化的触发-行动 Zaps。该平台适用于技术和非技术用户，提供无代码界面来配置智能代理、定义指令和连接数据源。智能代理可以拉取信息、草拟回复、更新记录以及在 Slack、Gmail、HubSpot、Notion 和 Google Workspace 等工具之间进行协调。它适合那些希望在现有的Zapier自动化流程中引入更智能、更灵活的AI行为的团队，而无需管理基础设施或编写代码。

主要功能

使用自然语言指令的 AI 代理
访问 7,000+ 个应用 APP 目录
定制数据源和知识输入
触发或按需执行代理
同时使用现有的 Zap
可视化的无-code 代理建造师

价格

模型: Freemium
分类: AI Agents
评分: 5.0 / 5 (6)

使用场景

自动化销售线索跟进

部署一个监视新 HubSpot 销售线索、在 Gmail 执行个性化 outreach 邮件和在 Slack 日志销售团队审核的代理。

智能邮箱分类和回复

使用一个代理来阅读来信，按意图分类，草拟背景化回复，并更新相关记录连同 CRMs 或 Notion 数据库。

跨应用任务协调

配置一个代理来协调 Slack、Google Workspace 和项目工具执行任务的多步过程，做决策决定路由和更新无需人工干预。

按需的研究助手

触发一个代理从自定义数据源和连接应用上获取信息，然后将总结的发现编译到一个 Notion 页面或 Slack 消息中

优点 & 缺点

优点

可连接 7,000+ 个应用
无代码配置用于非开发者
可以处理多步决定性任务
可以整合现有 Zap 和工作流程

缺点

成本随着重复使用而增加
性能取决于应用整合
比自定义写代码代理拥有更少的控制

评测

5.0

6 个评分的平均值。

登录以留下评测。

Grace Okafor

Feb 20, 2026

Years in this space

I've evaluated a lot of these over the years. What stands out here is custom data sources and knowledge inputs — handled better than most — and no-code setup for non-developers. Worth the time if this is your use case.

Liam O’Connor

Feb 3, 2026

Skeptical, then convinced

I went in skeptical — most tools in this space overpromise. It actually delivers on works alongside existing Zaps, and handles multi-step, decision-based tasks caught me off guard. Less control than custom-coded agents is why this isn't a perfect score, still, I'd recommend giving it a real trial.

Diego Fernández

Nov 7, 2025

Solid for our team

We rolled this out across the team last quarter and handles multi-step, decision-based tasks. Access to Zapier's 7,000+ app catalog fits neatly into how we already work, and access to Zapier's 7,000+ app catalog removed a step we used to do by hand. but it has held up under daily use.

George Papadakis

Sep 21, 2025

Does the job

Pretty happy overall. AI agents with natural language instructions just works and integrates with existing Zaps and workflows. Costs can scale with heavy usage can be annoying, but no dealbreakers — I'd recommend it to a friend without hesitating.

Robert Ainsworth

Aug 30, 2025

Skeptical, then convinced

I went in skeptical — most tools in this space overpromise. It actually delivers on triggered or on-demand agent execution, and integrates with existing Zaps and workflows caught me off guard. Costs can scale with heavy usage is why this isn't a perfect score, still, I'd recommend giving it a real trial.

Daniel Schmidt

Jul 6, 2025

Years in this space

I've evaluated a lot of these over the years. What stands out here is works alongside existing Zaps — handled better than most — and handles multi-step, decision-based tasks. Less control than custom-coded agents is my one real gripe. Worth the time if this is your use case.