
概览
主要功能
- 深入分析代码库
- 泄露分析
- 消除虚假阳性
- 威胁建模
- 对开发团队需要的定制修复
- 可直接合并的 Pull Request
价格
- 模型
- Free
- 评分
- 4.5 / 5 (4)
使用场景
自动化漏洞修复
自动检测和修复代码库中的安全漏洞,减轻安全和工程团队的工作量。
发布生产应用程序代码
通过应用安全最佳实践和补丁来加固应用程序代码,减少攻击面。
开发流动程式
将其集成到开发流程中,早期捕捉和解除bug,改进整体软件质量和可靠性。
持续性安全
成为一只持续安全工程师,提供持续的保护和代码改进,不需要专门的全职人员。
优点 & 缺点
优点
- 有效降低扫描器噪音,仅保留可利用漏洞
- 可以消除 98% 的虚假阳性
- 生成的修复代码可直接合并
- 尊重现有的安全规则和 CI 流程
- 基于证据的风险评估和定制化风险分数
- 提供个性化风险评估和优先级建议
缺点
- 可能无法捕捉所有潜在漏洞
- 需要将其与现有的代码库和安全政策集成
- 可能生成的修复代码不是开发人员最容易理解的
评测
4 个评分的平均值。
登录以留下评测。
Use it every day
Honestly didn't expect to like it this much. The automation is exactly what I needed, and support is responsive. but I reach for it almost every day now and it just clicks.
Compared a few options
Evaluated this against two competitors. Where it wins: the dashboard and support is responsive. Where it lags: the mobile experience lags. On balance the feature set — especially the core workflow — justifies the 4 stars for our use case.
Compared a few options
Evaluated this against two competitors. Where it wins: the automation and support is responsive. On balance the feature set — especially the integrations — justifies the 5 stars for our use case.
Skeptical, then convinced
I went in skeptical — most tools in this space overpromise. It actually delivers on the automation, and the value for money is strong caught me off guard. The docs could be deeper is why this isn't a perfect score, still, I'd recommend giving it a real trial.
问答
暂无问题 — 来当第一个提问的人吧。






