
概览
主要功能
- 通过 pull 请求自动修复漏洞
- 秘密检测和移除
- 依赖强化和更新
- 支持 GitHub、GitLab 和 CI 工具
- 与 Sonar 和 Semgrep 等现有扫描器兼容
- 人工智能辅助代码转换(带有解释)
价格
- 模型
- Freemium
- 评分
- 4.7 / 5 (6)
使用场景
通过 pull 请求自动修复漏洞
通过生成可直接合并的 pull 请求自动修复常见的漏洞类别,从而减少安全队列中的排版时间和简化安全排版问题的解决过程
从存储库中移除泄露的秘密
在源代码中检测出暴露的秘密并创建移除它们的修复方案,帮助团队快速处理敏感信息的泄露
加固风险依赖
识别脆弱或过期的依赖,并通过 pull 请求建议使用加固的版本或更新,让安全加固在团队的正常校审流程进行了整合
采取 SAST/SCA 扫描器检测结果
通过将扫描器的检测结果转化为具体的代码修复方案,填补检测和修复之间的漏洞检测工具和代码安全工具之间的漏洞
优点 & 缺点
优点
- 生成可直接合并的修复 pull 请求
- 增强现有 SAST/SCA 工具而不取代它们
- 涵盖漏洞、秘密和依赖风险
- 集成到标准 Git 和 CI 工作流程中
缺点
- 主要关注支持的语言和框架
- 自动修复仍需要人工审查
- 质量取决于上游扫描器的检测结果
评测
6 个评分的平均值。
登录以留下评测。
Solid for our team
We rolled this out across the team last quarter and integrates into standard Git and CI workflows. Automated vulnerability remediation via pull requests fits neatly into how we already work, and aI-assisted code transformations with explanations removed a step we used to do by hand. Automated fixes still require human review, which is the main caveat, but it has held up under daily use.
Years in this space
I've evaluated a lot of these over the years. What stands out here is works with existing scanners like Sonar and Semgrep — handled better than most — and augments existing SAST/SCA tools instead of replacing them. Automated fixes still require human review is my one real gripe. Worth the time if this is your use case.
Skeptical, then convinced
I went in skeptical — most tools in this space overpromise. It actually delivers on integration with GitHub, GitLab, and CI tools, and covers vulnerabilities, secrets, and dependency risks caught me off guard. still, I'd recommend giving it a real trial.
Skeptical, then convinced
I went in skeptical — most tools in this space overpromise. It actually delivers on aI-assisted code transformations with explanations, and generates ready-to-merge fix pull requests caught me off guard. still, I'd recommend giving it a real trial.
Use it every day
Honestly didn't expect to like it this much. Automated vulnerability remediation via pull requests is exactly what I needed, and augments existing SAST/SCA tools instead of replacing them. but I reach for it almost every day now and it just clicks.
Does the job
Pretty happy overall. Secrets detection and removal just works and integrates into standard Git and CI workflows. but no dealbreakers — I'd recommend it to a friend without hesitating.
问答
暂无问题 — 来当第一个提问的人吧。
提问
AI security 的替代品
ResumeHQ
AI security
用Claude驱动的会话式AI简历生成器,能从你的描述自动优化就业者追踪系统友好的简历
Vaultaire
AI security
iPhone 中基于模式加密的图片、视频和文件安全宝盒,零知识安全。
CapMonster Cloud
AI security
用于高容量爬虫和自动化工作流的自动CAPTCHA解答API
Vanta
AI security
自动化信任管理平台,兼具安全性和合规性。
ChainAware.ai
AI security
面向 Web3 钱包、代币和 dApp 的预测分析与欺诈检测。
Creasura
AI security
AI工具箱,优化在线业务绩效、安全性和营销工作流。
AutoPhish
AI security
AI 驱动的网络钓鱼模拟,培训员工并揭示人为安全薄弱环节。
Clerk
AI security
即插即用的身份验证和用户管理,适用于现代 Web 与移动应用。











