Jules谷歌的异步 AI 代碼代理程序，解决 Github 工作流程内的 bug 和測試

5.0 (4)

审阅者 Daniel Nikulshyn·更新 2026年5月

AI Coding Agent GitHub Integration Developer Tools Automation Asynchronous Google DevOps

概览

Jules 是一款由 Google 开发的异步编码代理，能够在没有持续开发者监督的情况下完成常规的软件工程任务。它可以接入 GitHub 仓库，读取代码库，并在后台处理已分配的问题，如修复 Bug、重构、依赖更新和测试创建。而不是作为基于聊天的配对程序员，Jules 更像是一名远程同事：你给它一个任务，它规划方案，在隔离环境中执行更改，并返回供人工审阅的 pull request。这使其非常适合在开发者专注于更高影响力的问题时，将维护工作外包。由于它是异步运行并与现有审核流程集成，团队可以利用 Jules 并行处理多项问题，并通过标准 PR 工作流保持人工控制。

主要功能

在隔离环境中独立执行任务
基于 Pull Request 的变更交付
自动 bug 修复和修补
自动单元测试生成和更新
依赖项和版本升级
github 仓库集成

价格

模型: Free
分类: Coding Agent
评分: 5.0 / 5 (4)

使用场景

自动 Bug 修复通过 Pull 请求

将 Github 问题分配给 Jules，让它诊断、修复并提交一个要进行审查的 Pull Request，释放开发人员从常规调试工作中

单元测试生成

将测试覆盖任务交给 Jules，它在后台生成和更新单元测试，使开发人员可以专注于特性开发

依赖项和版本升级

使用 Jules 处理繁琐的依赖项升级和版本升级，在整个仓库上交付变更作为一个可审查的 Pull Request

背景代碼重构

将重构任务交给 Jules，它在异步环境中工作并返回人类审查的建议变更

优点 & 缺点

优点

异步运行而不阻塞开发人员
原生 Github 集成基于 Pull Request
可以处理像测试和 bug 修复这样的乏味任务
由谷歌的研究和基础设施支持

缺点

仅限 Github 工作流程
输出仍然需要人类代码审查
可能难以处理复杂的架构变更
可用性和配额可能繁琐

对决战绩

在万神殿中参与了 1 对决。

第1

第2

第3

Last battle

#3
Coding Agent Showdown — June 20, 2026
Jun 20, 2026 · #3 of 6

评测

5.0

4 个评分的平均值。

登录以留下评测。

Diego Fernández

Mar 21, 2026

Compared a few options

Evaluated this against two competitors. Where it wins: autonomous task execution in isolated environments and native GitHub integration via pull requests. On balance the feature set — especially dependency and version upgrades — justifies the 5 stars for our use case.

Fatima Zahra

Jan 28, 2026

Compared a few options

Evaluated this against two competitors. Where it wins: gitHub repository integration and runs asynchronously without blocking developers. Where it lags: may struggle with complex architectural changes. On balance the feature set — especially automated bug fixing and patching — justifies the 5 stars for our use case.

Rina Desai

Nov 26, 2025

Compared a few options

Evaluated this against two competitors. Where it wins: automated bug fixing and patching and handles tedious tasks like tests and bug fixes. On balance the feature set — especially unit test generation and updates — justifies the 5 stars for our use case.

Tariq Aziz

Oct 28, 2025

Skeptical, then convinced

I went in skeptical — most tools in this space overpromise. It actually delivers on automated bug fixing and patching, and native GitHub integration via pull requests caught me off guard. May struggle with complex architectural changes is why this isn't a perfect score, still, I'd recommend giving it a real trial.

问答

How does Jules fit into our existing GitHub code review process?

Jules works asynchronously in an isolated environment and delivers its changes as pull requests against your GitHub repository. Your team reviews, comments on, and merges those PRs using your normal review workflow, so human approval remains a required step.

What kinds of engineering tasks is Jules best suited for?

Jules is designed for routine, well-scoped work like bug fixes, patches, refactors, dependency and version upgrades, and generating or updating unit tests. It's less reliable for complex architectural changes, which still need hands-on developer attention.

What are Jules's main limitations to be aware of before adopting it?

Jules only supports GitHub-based workflows, so non-GitHub repos aren't covered. All output still requires human code review, it may struggle with deep architectural work, and availability and usage quotas can be restrictive depending on access.