AgentPantheon
Apollo logo

Apollo自动化时间追踪与活动捕获,助你提升计费收入。

4.5 (6)
Daniel Nikulshyn审阅者 Daniel Nikulshyn·更新 2026年7月

概览

Apollo 是一款为按小时计费的专业人士(如律师、顾问和会计师)设计的时间记录与活动捕获工具。它在后台悄无声息地运行,记录你全天与应用程序、文档和会议的交互,确保没有任何细节被遗漏。 每日或每周结束时,用户可以查看清晰的活动时间轴,并轻松将其转换为准确的工时表。通过减少低报和重建推测,Apollo 帮助律所追回失去的可计费工时并提升收入捕获。 该工具定位为一层提升生产力和收入保障的插件,可与现有计费或实践管理系统协同使用,而非替代它们。

主要功能

  • 自动活动与应用程序跟踪
  • 每日和每周时间重建视图
  • 从捕获的数据生成工时表
  • 与计费和实践工具集成
  • 对时间分配和利用率的洞察
  • 跨桌面应用程序后台运行

价格

模型
Freemium
评分
4.5 / 5 (6)

使用场景

为律师事务所追回失去的可计费工时

律师可以自动捕获他们处理的每份文件、邮件和会议,然后将活动时间线转换为准确的工时表,恢复未计费时间。

顾问的轻松工时表

顾问在管理多个客户时,可依赖Apollo后台跟踪重建日程,消除手工记录,减少周末猜测。

会计事务所的收入保障

会计公司可利用Apollo对时间分配和利用率的洞察,识别低报工作并提升团队整体收入捕获。

简化计费工作流集成

公司可将Apollo与现有计费及实践管理工具连接,将捕获的时间直接推送至发票,减少行政负担。

优点 & 缺点

优点

  • 无需繁琐操作,自动捕获活动
  • 帮助追回未计费或被遗忘的时间
  • 清晰的每日时间轴,便于快速审查工时表
  • 对律师、顾问等按小时计费专业人士尤为有用

缺点

  • 主要适用于按小时计费的工作流程
  • 后台跟踪可能引发部分用户的隐私担忧
  • 需要持续使用才能显著影响收入

评测

4.5

6 个评分的平均值。

5
3
4
3
3
0
2
0
1
0

登录以留下评测。

G

Grace Okafor

Apr 13, 2026

Compared a few options

Evaluated this against two competitors. Where it wins: background operation across desktop apps and clear daily timeline for quick timesheet review. Where it lags: primarily valuable for hourly-billing workflows. On balance the feature set — especially daily and weekly time reconstruction view — justifies the 4 stars for our use case.

F

Fatima Zahra

Apr 2, 2026

Use it every day

Honestly didn't expect to like it this much. Background operation across desktop apps is exactly what I needed, and helps recover unbilled or forgotten time. I do wish background tracking may raise privacy concerns for some users, but I reach for it almost every day now and it just clicks.

B

Beatriz Costa

Feb 20, 2026

Solid for our team

We rolled this out across the team last quarter and helps recover unbilled or forgotten time. Automatic activity and application tracking fits neatly into how we already work, and insights into time allocation and utilization removed a step we used to do by hand. Background tracking may raise privacy concerns for some users, which is the main caveat, but it has held up under daily use.

P

Pierre Dubois

Nov 28, 2025

Compared a few options

Evaluated this against two competitors. Where it wins: background operation across desktop apps and useful for billable professionals like lawyers and consultants. Where it lags: background tracking may raise privacy concerns for some users. On balance the feature set — especially timesheet generation from captured data — justifies the 4 stars for our use case.

V

Victor Nguyen

Sep 15, 2025

Compared a few options

Evaluated this against two competitors. Where it wins: daily and weekly time reconstruction view and useful for billable professionals like lawyers and consultants. Where it lags: primarily valuable for hourly-billing workflows. On balance the feature set — especially timesheet generation from captured data — justifies the 4 stars for our use case.

G

Gunnar Eriksson

Aug 27, 2025

Solid for our team

We rolled this out across the team last quarter and useful for billable professionals like lawyers and consultants. Integration with billing and practice tools fits neatly into how we already work, and background operation across desktop apps removed a step we used to do by hand. but it has held up under daily use.

问答

暂无问题 — 来当第一个提问的人吧。

提问

Large Language Models (LLMs) 的替代品