概览
主要功能
- 鼠标和键盘输入仿真
- 对屏幕上可见元素的视觉解读
- 跨应用程序任务自动化
- 自然语言任务指令
- 自主多步骤执行
- 直接在用户桌面运行
价格
- 模型
- Contact for pricing
- 评分
- 4.7 / 5 (6)
使用场景
自动化重复的行政工作
将数据录入、表单填写或文件整理等常规任务委派到桌面应用中，让其在后台自主运行，您可以专注于更高价值的工作。
桥接无 API 的旧版软件
通过让 Ace 以人类操作员的方式与缺少 API 的旧版或专有应用程序的 GUI 交互，自动化这些工作流。
跨应用多步骤工作流
使用自然语言指令在浏览器、电子表格和办公工具之间链式执行动作，让代理导航每个界面以完成整个流程。
无手动后台任务执行
将耗时、需要大量点击的流程交给 Ace，在后台完成，从而解放用户的手部操作。
优点 & 缺点
优点
- 适用于任何具有图形界面的应用程序
- 无需设置 API 或集成
- 自动化多步骤桌面工作流
- 模拟自然的人类输入模式
缺点
- 基于屏幕的控制可能比直接 API 更慢
- 性能可能取决于目标应用的 UI 更改
- 需要信任以控制鼠标和键盘
- 对代理决策的透明度有限
对决战绩
在万神殿中参与了 1 对决。
Last battle
评测
6 个评分的平均值。
登录以留下评测。
Compared a few options
Evaluated this against two competitors. Where it wins: autonomous multi-step execution and works with any app that has a graphical interface. Where it lags: limited transparency into agent decisions. On balance the feature set — especially runs directly on the user's desktop — justifies the 5 stars for our use case.
Solid for our team
We rolled this out across the team last quarter and works with any app that has a graphical interface. Autonomous multi-step execution fits neatly into how we already work, and cross-application task automation removed a step we used to do by hand. Performance may depend on UI changes in target apps, which is the main caveat, but it has held up under daily use.
Skeptical, then convinced
I went in skeptical — most tools in this space overpromise. It actually delivers on autonomous multi-step execution, and works with any app that has a graphical interface caught me off guard. still, I'd recommend giving it a real trial.
Does the job
Pretty happy overall. Runs directly on the user's desktop just works and works with any app that has a graphical interface. but no dealbreakers — I'd recommend it to a friend without hesitating.
Solid for our team
We rolled this out across the team last quarter and automates multi-step desktop workflows. Mouse and keyboard input simulation fits neatly into how we already work, and autonomous multi-step execution removed a step we used to do by hand. but it has held up under daily use.
Years in this space
I've evaluated a lot of these over the years. What stands out here is runs directly on the user's desktop — handled better than most — and mimics natural human input patterns. Screen-based control can be slower than direct APIs is my one real gripe. Worth the time if this is your use case.
问答
How does Ace integrate with my existing apps?
Ace doesn't require traditional integrations or APIs. It controls your mouse and keyboard and visually interprets on-screen elements, so it works with virtually any desktop application that has a graphical interface, including browsers, productivity suites, and legacy software.
What kinds of tasks is Ace best suited for?
Ace is designed for repetitive multi-step desktop workflows, routine admin work, and cross-application sequences that would otherwise require scripting or brittle macros. You give it natural language instructions and it executes autonomously in the background while you focus on other work.
What are the main limitations I should be aware of?
Because Ace operates by simulating human input and reading the screen, it can be slower than direct API automations and may be affected by UI changes in target apps. It also requires trusting it with mouse and keyboard control and offers limited transparency into its decisions.
提问
Virtual Workers 的替代品
Avaamo
Virtual Workers
企业级对话式 AI 平台，用于在各业务职能中构建虚拟客服与数字化工作者。
Hugging Face Open Computer Agent
Virtual Workers
一款开源的AI代理，通过在虚拟Linux环境中模拟用户交互来自动化网页任务。
One Click Store
Virtual Workers
AI智能平台，快速在分钟内创建电子商店，自动生成内容和SEO。
Roo Code
Virtual Workers
完全自动的开源 AI 代理，可以在最小人类干预的情况下编码、调试和演化软件。
Tally AI
Virtual Workers
自动化会计、税务和审计任务的 AI 代理人，内置于您的现有系统中。
Perplexity Computer
Virtual Workers
始终运行的数字工作者，通过应用连接器、研究、编码以及预定监控和动作来执行全面的工作流程。
Jumbo Mana
Virtual Workers
创建互动的 AI 人物，包括数字双子，增强用户参与度
Convergence Proxy
Virtual Workers
自适应 AI 助手，可通过实际使用即时学习新技能。
