Build In Public Log

A public log that ranks indie builders by what they ship, not their follower count.

4.2 (6)

Reseñado por Daniel Nikulshyn·Actualizado mayo de 2026

Productivity Indie Hackers Build In Public Maker Tools Community Leaderboard

Resumen

Build In Public Log is a community leaderboard for makers who want their progress measured by output instead of audience size. Builders post updates about features shipped, products launched, and milestones reached, and the platform ranks them based on consistent delivery. The tool is aimed at solo founders, indie hackers, and small teams who prefer transparent progress tracking over social media metrics. By focusing on shipping cadence, it offers an alternative signal for credibility in the build-in-public community.

Funciones clave

Shipping-based leaderboard ranking
Public build logs for each maker
Milestone and launch tracking
Community discovery of active builders
Progress streaks and activity history

Casos de uso

Track shipping cadence as a solo founder

Log each feature, launch, and milestone in a public build log to demonstrate consistent delivery and hold yourself accountable without relying on follower counts.

Discover active indie builders to follow

Browse the leaderboard to find makers ranked by what they actually ship, surfacing collaborators, peers, or projects worth watching based on real output.

Build credibility without a large audience

Use a verifiable history of shipped work and progress streaks as an alternative signal of credibility when pitching users, partners, or early customers.

Maintain momentum with progress streaks

Small teams can use streaks and activity history to stay motivated, turning shipping into a visible habit that reinforces consistent delivery over time.

Pros y contras

Pros

Rewards consistent shipping over vanity metrics
Encourages public accountability
Useful discovery tool for active builders
Simple, focused purpose

Contras

Depends on honest self-reporting
Less useful for builders with long release cycles
Smaller audience than established social platforms

Reseñas

4.2

Promedio de 6 valoraciones.

Inicia sesión para dejar una reseña.

Daniel Schmidt

Skeptical, then convinced

I went in skeptical — most tools in this space overpromise. It actually delivers on community discovery of active builders, and useful discovery tool for active builders caught me off guard. Depends on honest self-reporting is why this isn't a perfect score, still, I'd recommend giving it a real trial.

Fatima Zahra

Skeptical, then convinced

I went in skeptical — most tools in this space overpromise. It actually delivers on shipping-based leaderboard ranking, and useful discovery tool for active builders caught me off guard. Smaller audience than established social platforms is why this isn't a perfect score, still, I'd recommend giving it a real trial.

Hiroshi Tanaka

Years in this space

I've evaluated a lot of these over the years. What stands out here is shipping-based leaderboard ranking — handled better than most — and simple, focused purpose. Less useful for builders with long release cycles is my one real gripe. Worth the time if this is your use case.

Nadia Petrova

Use it every day

Honestly didn't expect to like it this much. Milestone and launch tracking is exactly what I needed, and encourages public accountability. I do wish less useful for builders with long release cycles, but I reach for it almost every day now and it just clicks.

Esther Adeyemi

Does the job

Pretty happy overall. Shipping-based leaderboard ranking just works and simple, focused purpose. but no dealbreakers — I'd recommend it to a friend without hesitating.

Kwame Mensah

Years in this space

I've evaluated a lot of these over the years. What stands out here is public build logs for each maker — handled better than most — and useful discovery tool for active builders. Less useful for builders with long release cycles is my one real gripe. Worth the time if this is your use case.