AgentPantheon
urlDNA logo

urlDNAThreat intelligence API delivering URL and domain risk signals to security-focused AI agents.

4.5 (4)
Daniel NikulshynReviewed by Daniel Nikulshyn·Updated July 2026

Overview

urlDNA provides a threat intelligence API that delivers URL and domain risk signals to security-focused AI agents. It helps identify potential threats and malicious URLs, enabling AI agents to make informed decisions about online safety. The API likely analyzes URLs and domains for various risk factors, such as malware, phishing, and spam. This service appears to be designed for developers and organizations building AI-powered security solutions. Without further information, specific implementation details and integration capabilities are unknown.

Key features

  • URL and domain scanning
  • Phishing and malware detection
  • Brand impersonation analysis
  • Threat intelligence API
  • Integration-ready data for AI agents
  • Real-time risk scoring

Pricing

Model
Free
Category
AI security
Rating
4.5 / 5 (4)

Use cases

Enrich SOC alerts with URL risk context

Security operations teams can pipe suspicious URLs from alerts into urlDNA's API to retrieve real-time risk scores and threat indicators for faster triage.

Power AI agents for incident response

LLM-based security assistants can call urlDNA to fetch structured threat intelligence on domains and URLs, enabling automated investigation and response workflows.

Detect phishing and brand impersonation

Fraud and brand protection teams can scan URLs to identify phishing pages and impersonation attempts targeting their organization in real time.

Automate suspicious link triage

Developers can integrate urlDNA into email, chat, or ticketing pipelines to automatically analyze and classify reported links before they reach analysts.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Purpose-built for cybersecurity use cases
  • API-first design suited to AI agents
  • Real-time URL and domain scanning
  • Structured threat intelligence output

Cons

  • Narrow focus limited to web threat analysis
  • Requires technical integration to use effectively
  • Less useful outside security workflows

Reviews

4.5

Average from 4 ratings.

5
2
4
2
3
0
2
0
1
0

Sign in to leave a review.

V

Victor Nguyen

May 8, 2026

Use it every day

Honestly didn't expect to like it this much. Brand impersonation analysis is exactly what I needed, and real-time URL and domain scanning. but I reach for it almost every day now and it just clicks.

L

Linda Petersen

Apr 11, 2026

Compared a few options

Evaluated this against two competitors. Where it wins: brand impersonation analysis and structured threat intelligence output. Where it lags: narrow focus limited to web threat analysis. On balance the feature set — especially threat intelligence API — justifies the 4 stars for our use case.

D

Devin Walker

Oct 5, 2025

Use it every day

Honestly didn't expect to like it this much. Brand impersonation analysis is exactly what I needed, and aPI-first design suited to AI agents. I do wish narrow focus limited to web threat analysis, but I reach for it almost every day now and it just clicks.

J

Jamal Carter

Aug 28, 2025

Years in this space

I've evaluated a lot of these over the years. What stands out here is integration-ready data for AI agents — handled better than most — and purpose-built for cybersecurity use cases. Narrow focus limited to web threat analysis is my one real gripe. Worth the time if this is your use case.

Q&A

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Ask a question

AI security alternatives