Amplify SecurityAutomated, context-aware fixes for code security flaws delivered as pull requests.

4.4 (5)

Reviewed by Daniel Nikulshyn·Updated May 2026

Application Security DevSecOps Code Analysis Automated Remediation Developer Tools CI/CD Integration AI-Powered

Overview

Amplify Security is a developer-focused application security tool that automatically detects vulnerabilities in source code and generates ready-to-review fixes. Instead of just flagging issues, it produces patch suggestions as pull requests, helping engineering teams remediate flaws without leaving their normal workflow. The platform integrates with common code hosting and CI systems, analyzing repositories for issues such as injection risks, insecure dependencies, and misconfigurations. By pairing detection with automated remediation, it aims to shrink the gap between identifying a vulnerability and shipping a fix. It is positioned for security and development teams that want to reduce backlog noise, speed up mean time to remediation, and embed security into everyday code review rather than treating it as a separate audit process.

Key features

Automated vulnerability detection in source code
AI-generated remediation pull requests
Integration with code repositories and CI pipelines
Context-aware patch suggestions
Support for common application security flaw classes
Developer-centric review workflow

Pricing

Model: Freemium
Category: AI security
Rating: 4.4 / 5 (5)

Use cases

Automated Vulnerability Patching

Detect security flaws in source code and receive AI-generated pull requests with ready-to-review fixes, reducing time from discovery to remediation.

Secure CI/CD Pipeline Integration

Embed security scanning and remediation directly into existing CI pipelines and code repositories, keeping fixes within developers' normal workflows.

Addressing Injection and Dependency Risks

Identify and remediate common flaw classes such as injection vulnerabilities, insecure dependencies, and misconfigurations across application code.

Reducing AppSec Backlogs

Help security teams clear vulnerability backlogs by automating patch generation, so engineers can focus on reviewing fixes rather than writing them from scratch.

Pros & Cons

Pros

Generates actual code fixes, not just alerts
Delivers remediations through familiar pull request workflow
Reduces time from detection to patch
Integrates into existing developer tooling

Cons

Automated fixes still require human review
Effectiveness varies by language and codebase complexity
Limited public detail on pricing and coverage

Battle record

Across 1 battle in the Pantheon.

1st

2nd

3rd

Last battle

#2
AI security Showdown — June 15, 2026
Jun 15, 2026 · #2 of 6

Reviews

4.4

Average from 5 ratings.

Diego Fernández

May 9, 2026

Years in this space

I've evaluated a lot of these over the years. What stands out here is developer-centric review workflow — handled better than most — and generates actual code fixes, not just alerts. Effectiveness varies by language and codebase complexity is my one real gripe. Worth the time if this is your use case.

Yuki Mori

Apr 18, 2026

Does the job

Pretty happy overall. Developer-centric review workflow just works and delivers remediations through familiar pull request workflow. but no dealbreakers — I'd recommend it to a friend without hesitating.

George Papadakis

Jan 15, 2026

Skeptical, then convinced

I went in skeptical — most tools in this space overpromise. It actually delivers on developer-centric review workflow, and reduces time from detection to patch caught me off guard. Automated fixes still require human review is why this isn't a perfect score, still, I'd recommend giving it a real trial.

Omar Haddad

Dec 25, 2025

Years in this space

I've evaluated a lot of these over the years. What stands out here is developer-centric review workflow — handled better than most — and reduces time from detection to patch. Limited public detail on pricing and coverage is my one real gripe. Worth the time if this is your use case.

Naomi Suzuki

Aug 21, 2025

Compared a few options

Evaluated this against two competitors. Where it wins: aI-generated remediation pull requests and integrates into existing developer tooling. Where it lags: effectiveness varies by language and codebase complexity. On balance the feature set — especially aI-generated remediation pull requests — justifies the 5 stars for our use case.