Semantic Kernel

Open-source SDK for orchestrating AI models within conventional code.

4.6 (5)

Overview

Semantic Kernel is a developer SDK from Microsoft that helps integrate large language models and other AI services into applications written in C#, Python, or Java. It treats AI capabilities as composable functions that can be mixed with native code, making it easier to build agents, pipelines, and workflows. The framework offers abstractions for prompts, plugins, memory, planners, and model connectors, letting teams swap between providers like OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, and Hugging Face. It is designed for production scenarios, with extensibility points for telemetry, dependency injection, and enterprise patterns. Semantic Kernel is particularly useful for teams already invested in mainstream programming stacks who want to add AI orchestration without rewriting their applications in an AI-first framework.

Key features

  • Prompt and plugin abstractions
  • Agent and planner orchestration
  • Memory and vector store connectors
  • Multi-language SDK support
  • Integration with Azure and OpenAI services
  • Telemetry and dependency injection hooks

Use cases

Embed LLMs into enterprise C# applications

Use the SDK to integrate OpenAI or Azure OpenAI models into existing .NET codebases, treating AI capabilities as composable functions alongside native code.

Build multi-step AI agents and planners

Leverage planner and agent abstractions to orchestrate prompts, plugins, and tools into automated workflows that execute complex tasks.

Add memory and retrieval to AI workflows

Connect vector stores through memory abstractions to give applications context-aware recall, supporting RAG patterns across supported model providers.

Swap AI providers without rewriting apps

Use pluggable model connectors to switch between OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, and Hugging Face, reducing vendor lock-in for production AI systems.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Open source and backed by Microsoft
  • Supports C#, Python, and Java
  • Pluggable model and memory providers
  • Fits into existing enterprise codebases

Cons

  • Steeper learning curve than no-code tools
  • APIs have evolved with breaking changes
  • Documentation can lag behind releases

Reviews

4.6

Average from 5 ratings.

5
3
4
2
3
0
2
0
1
0

Sign in to leave a review.

C

Carlos Mendoza

Skeptical, then convinced

I went in skeptical — most tools in this space overpromise. It actually delivers on agent and planner orchestration, and open source and backed by Microsoft caught me off guard. APIs have evolved with breaking changes is why this isn't a perfect score, still, I'd recommend giving it a real trial.

N

Nadia Petrova

Does the job

Pretty happy overall. Multi-language SDK support just works and fits into existing enterprise codebases. Documentation can lag behind releases can be annoying, but no dealbreakers — I'd recommend it to a friend without hesitating.

M

Margaret Whitfield

Compared a few options

Evaluated this against two competitors. Where it wins: multi-language SDK support and pluggable model and memory providers. On balance the feature set — especially agent and planner orchestration — justifies the 5 stars for our use case.

L

Leila Hassan

Solid for our team

We rolled this out across the team last quarter and open source and backed by Microsoft. Agent and planner orchestration fits neatly into how we already work, and agent and planner orchestration removed a step we used to do by hand. Steeper learning curve than no-code tools, which is the main caveat, but it has held up under daily use.

A

Aisha Khan

Use it every day

Honestly didn't expect to like it this much. Integration with Azure and OpenAI services is exactly what I needed, and supports C#, Python, and Java. but I reach for it almost every day now and it just clicks.

Q&A

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Ask a question

AI Agents Frameworks alternatives